webdez
10-02 09:44 AM
HI,
You can attach text to any path in Illustrator and then export to Swift. Thanks.
You can attach text to any path in Illustrator and then export to Swift. Thanks.
wallpaper Stock Market Business
reachinus
10-01 07:35 AM
I am not sure if its a new rule to get an NOC from the husband, but as far as i know NOC is required only for Govt Employees. Make sure you really need one for getting a passport for an individual. If your wife is a Govt Employee then she may need one from the Govt/Office where she works.
alien007
02-15 08:34 AM
not a problem at all. but when u go for stamping, u should mention ur salary to be whatever is in your w2.
2011 Stock vector - Business
chanduv23
10-30 11:29 AM
Great pics, more to follow.
Here are some from mpadapa
http://www2.snapfish.com/share/p=967281193634848895/l=317986840/g=97458101/otsc=SYE/otsi=SALB
Here are some from mpadapa
http://www2.snapfish.com/share/p=967281193634848895/l=317986840/g=97458101/otsc=SYE/otsi=SALB
more...
cox
August 17th, 2005, 06:48 PM
I agree with Henrik. Great color. Where'd you take this?
sargon
10-20 09:01 PM
^^^^
more...
rnatrajan1
03-01 12:57 AM
I work for company A which sponsored my L1B (my current visa status). Also, few years back company B sponsored my H1B which for some reason I did not utilize (did not even get it stamped) and hence company B cancelled it. Now my questions are -
1. Can L1-B be transferred to H1-B without going through a new visa application?
2. Can the cancelled H1-B be re-instated and utilized?
3. If another company C applies for my H1-B what are the chances of getting it looking at the current work visa regulations and prospective changes? Will my past petition of H1-B cause some issues with consulate?
4. My wife is on L2 and as EAD. Once I file for change of status will the EAD still be valid or it will automatically be void?
Please Help...
1. Can L1-B be transferred to H1-B without going through a new visa application?
2. Can the cancelled H1-B be re-instated and utilized?
3. If another company C applies for my H1-B what are the chances of getting it looking at the current work visa regulations and prospective changes? Will my past petition of H1-B cause some issues with consulate?
4. My wife is on L2 and as EAD. Once I file for change of status will the EAD still be valid or it will automatically be void?
Please Help...
2010 Stock Photo - Business People
martinvisalaw
06-03 06:08 PM
You should change to H-4 (assuming you are eligible) if you are not working. You should be able to change back H-1B later and get the remainder of your 6 years, without being subject to the cap, if you find a new employer. It is important not to violate status now, and not working violates your H-1 status even if the lack of work is not your choice.
more...
dreamgc_real
02-01 08:48 AM
F1 - Immigration Wiki (http://immigrationvoice.org/wiki/index.php/F1)
Talk to your guidance counselor, they will be in a better position to provide you with advice.
Talk to your guidance counselor, they will be in a better position to provide you with advice.
hair Business People Stock 280
dealsnet
08-27 04:53 PM
No. You can't port PD from spouse.
You can port your own PD, if you have another EB3 approved.
You can port the country of chargeability, if she was born in another (ROW) country.
My priority date is in 10/2006 under EB3. My wife just start her GC process under EB2. Can my wife port my PD date to her GC application?
Thanks!
You can port your own PD, if you have another EB3 approved.
You can port the country of chargeability, if she was born in another (ROW) country.
My priority date is in 10/2006 under EB3. My wife just start her GC process under EB2. Can my wife port my PD date to her GC application?
Thanks!
more...
Eb3Pro
09-16 10:40 AM
Visa Bulletin October 2009 (http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4575.html)
hot Business People Stock 8265
kshitijnt
04-26 06:42 PM
Hello Gurus:
I am self filing my EAD/AP: Following documents I have attached to both EAD and AP.
1. Copy of previous EAD/AP (both front and back)
2. Copy of 485 receipt notice
3. Copy of DL/ passport, Visa stamp
4. Copy of I-94 front and back
5. Letter stating why AP is required
6. Letter requesting fee exemption due to filing under new fee structure.
Can I send all applications in one packet? Or should I send them in separate packets?
I am self filing my EAD/AP: Following documents I have attached to both EAD and AP.
1. Copy of previous EAD/AP (both front and back)
2. Copy of 485 receipt notice
3. Copy of DL/ passport, Visa stamp
4. Copy of I-94 front and back
5. Letter stating why AP is required
6. Letter requesting fee exemption due to filing under new fee structure.
Can I send all applications in one packet? Or should I send them in separate packets?
more...
house Laminated Stock Art Business
anilsal
08-06 01:00 AM
and the core. 25K is quite close?
tattoo Stock Vector - Business Cards
maddipati1
01-31 11:07 PM
i was in same situation. my wife's AP was approved and mine not, before leaving US, so i went for h1 stamping but, my wife didnt. on return, i entered on H1 and she entered on AP.
SFO port. they asked her to go to secondary inspection room, had to wait for 1/2 hr. they called her name, no questions asked, gave her docs back. we both were in.
this was back in Feb'09. i work directly for F100, popular company.
SFO port. they asked her to go to secondary inspection room, had to wait for 1/2 hr. they called her name, no questions asked, gave her docs back. we both were in.
this was back in Feb'09. i work directly for F100, popular company.
more...
pictures Stock photo: Business man with
franklin
05-04 10:53 AM
Hey there
Can someone point me to a resource that will allow me to quickly colate info on positive and negative bills for us. Specifically (right now) ones in the Senate.
I posted about this yesterday, but my post vanished :eek:
Can someone point me to a resource that will allow me to quickly colate info on positive and negative bills for us. Specifically (right now) ones in the Senate.
I posted about this yesterday, but my post vanished :eek:
dresses stock-vector-usiness-design-
sankap
07-10 06:58 PM
This was posted and widely discussed here the night before the print edition published...
more...
makeup Business amp; Management
Macaca
06-19 07:30 AM
House Delays Thorny Energy Issues (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118221331128639861-search.html?KEYWORDS=immigration&COLLECTION=wsjie/6month) By John J. Fialka, The Wall Street Journal, 19 June 2007
WASHINGTON -- Facing a tight deadline imposed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Democratic leaders of the Energy and Commerce Committee postponed until the fall House debates on several controversial energy issues, including tougher standards for automobile fuel efficiency.
It wasn't immediately clear what impact the House move toward a simplified, less-controversial energy measure will have on the Senate version of the bill. The Senate is scheduled to debate auto-efficiency standards and a mandate for coal-based liquid fuels on the floor this week.
Rep. John D. Dingell (D., Mich.), chairman of the House committee, and Rick Boucher (D., Va.) chairman of the subcommittee that is preparing its energy legislation, jointly announced they will focus on less-divisive issues, including energy-efficiency standards for appliances, improvements to the nation's electricity grid and incentives for use of wind power.
"This procedure . . . was discussed with the speaker, and she understands the rationale for proceeding this way," the two Democrat leaders said, "so we can rapidly work on a bipartisan bill that can be signed into law."
The turnaround by Rep. Dingell, who has defended Detroit automakers against fuel-saving standards for years, comes as automakers have launched a nationwide lobbying campaign to water down proposed tougher auto-efficiency standards. Rep. Dingell promised to return to the issue in the fall, when the committee is also planning legislation that would regulate carbon dioxide and other emissions that scientists say are accelerating global warming.
While the Senate appears to be pressing ahead, it could face filibuster threats on the auto-efficiency standards and several other items, requiring 60 votes to overcome, a margin that may not be attainable. "One of the questions being discussed is which body goes first with some of these things," a House aide said.
"We have decided to proceed with provisions that represent consensus," Messrs. Dingell and Boucher wrote. The energy subcommittee is scheduled to assemble its new version of the energy bill this week, and the House could debate the completed bill after the July 4 recess. Earlier, Speaker Pelosi (D., Calif.) had asked for an "Energy Independence" bill by July 4.
The House committee also deferred discussion of a low-carbon-fuel standard, similar to California's, which would mandate increasing use of ethanol and other fuels that result in lower CO2 emissions. Another postponed issue is a change in federal law that would block California from establishing its own CO2 emissions standards for vehicles.
The two committee leaders said they were postponing debate because the issues "are complex and difficult."
Democrats are deeply split, with representatives from auto-producing states fighting tougher emissions standards, and the California delegation and liberal factions pushing for them. Coal-state Democrats and environmentally inclined Democrats are on opposite sides over coal-to-liquid fuels, which would emphasize diesel and jet fuels made from coal, a fuel the U.S. has in abundance.
WASHINGTON -- Facing a tight deadline imposed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Democratic leaders of the Energy and Commerce Committee postponed until the fall House debates on several controversial energy issues, including tougher standards for automobile fuel efficiency.
It wasn't immediately clear what impact the House move toward a simplified, less-controversial energy measure will have on the Senate version of the bill. The Senate is scheduled to debate auto-efficiency standards and a mandate for coal-based liquid fuels on the floor this week.
Rep. John D. Dingell (D., Mich.), chairman of the House committee, and Rick Boucher (D., Va.) chairman of the subcommittee that is preparing its energy legislation, jointly announced they will focus on less-divisive issues, including energy-efficiency standards for appliances, improvements to the nation's electricity grid and incentives for use of wind power.
"This procedure . . . was discussed with the speaker, and she understands the rationale for proceeding this way," the two Democrat leaders said, "so we can rapidly work on a bipartisan bill that can be signed into law."
The turnaround by Rep. Dingell, who has defended Detroit automakers against fuel-saving standards for years, comes as automakers have launched a nationwide lobbying campaign to water down proposed tougher auto-efficiency standards. Rep. Dingell promised to return to the issue in the fall, when the committee is also planning legislation that would regulate carbon dioxide and other emissions that scientists say are accelerating global warming.
While the Senate appears to be pressing ahead, it could face filibuster threats on the auto-efficiency standards and several other items, requiring 60 votes to overcome, a margin that may not be attainable. "One of the questions being discussed is which body goes first with some of these things," a House aide said.
"We have decided to proceed with provisions that represent consensus," Messrs. Dingell and Boucher wrote. The energy subcommittee is scheduled to assemble its new version of the energy bill this week, and the House could debate the completed bill after the July 4 recess. Earlier, Speaker Pelosi (D., Calif.) had asked for an "Energy Independence" bill by July 4.
The House committee also deferred discussion of a low-carbon-fuel standard, similar to California's, which would mandate increasing use of ethanol and other fuels that result in lower CO2 emissions. Another postponed issue is a change in federal law that would block California from establishing its own CO2 emissions standards for vehicles.
The two committee leaders said they were postponing debate because the issues "are complex and difficult."
Democrats are deeply split, with representatives from auto-producing states fighting tougher emissions standards, and the California delegation and liberal factions pushing for them. Coal-state Democrats and environmentally inclined Democrats are on opposite sides over coal-to-liquid fuels, which would emphasize diesel and jet fuels made from coal, a fuel the U.S. has in abundance.
girlfriend Stock Photo - Business People
Bobby Digital
September 24th, 2005, 08:42 PM
Why won't my pictures come up on the critique gallery? I can see them,but when I click on them it just show the name with no pic.
hairstyles Stock Vector - Business Cards
dealsnet
01-31 09:30 AM
You are already counted in the quota. So it is just transfer. But for transfer need recent paystubs. Consult a lawyer how to handle this. Definitly you no need to wait for April 1 st quota for new H1B.
mach1343
09-24 05:18 PM
You will be out-ofstatus. And you need to find a job before 30-day grace period (it depends on the person who is handling your case) and move back to H1. Otherwise you cab either change to a different visa category if possible else you have to find a job and get your H1 through consular processing which happens to visit your home country get the visa stamped and comeback to US.
I am not sure about your previous H1B. if they have revoke your h1 then you cant do anything.
This is my opinion. But you can wait what others to say about this.
I am not sure about your previous H1B. if they have revoke your h1 then you cant do anything.
This is my opinion. But you can wait what others to say about this.
honge_kamyaab
06-14 01:59 PM
Apparently there are people who file for I-485 and I140 without labor approval.
I don't know how many people did this, but I heard there are cases of this kind.
What is the validity of this information? If it is valid, what are the risks?
The person who informed me went further explaining the procedure. He said that one needs to just file and wait for further documentation request from CIS. Upon labor approval complete documentation is presented to CIS.
Experienced souls, please advise.
I don't know how many people did this, but I heard there are cases of this kind.
What is the validity of this information? If it is valid, what are the risks?
The person who informed me went further explaining the procedure. He said that one needs to just file and wait for further documentation request from CIS. Upon labor approval complete documentation is presented to CIS.
Experienced souls, please advise.