.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

tattoos de estrellas

images tattoo texts. tattoos de tattoos de estrellas. tattoos de estrellas.
  • tattoos de estrellas.

  • acecupid
    08-13 04:12 PM

    The Mexico F2A and Employment Third preference cut-off dates are �unavailable� for both August and September, since those FY-2008 annual limits have been reached. The Visa Office had originally anticipated that this would be a temporary situation. Then with the start of the new fiscal year in October the cut-off dates would have returned to those which had applied during June. However, continued heavy demand in those categories may require the establishment of cut-off dates which are earlier than those which had applied in June. A formal decision determination of the October cut-off dates will not be possible until early September.

    Does this mean entire EB3 category will be retrogressed in Oct or Mexico has a separate category?

    wallpaper tattoos de estrellas. tattoos de estrellas. Tattoo alas con estrella
  • Tattoo alas con estrella

  • sri1309
    02-14 09:57 AM
    IV Core,

    Can you please monitor the threads more closely and remove anytning like this. If you are running out of resources, please add some more guys who can do this. There are many guys who always post constructive threads all the time. I may be one of them, if you look at all my previous posts. I can help in cleansing some bad threads here. This thread is insulting to us all, and more to you who maintain this forum, if I am not wrong.

    tattoos de estrellas. tatuajes de mujeres en los
  • tatuajes de mujeres en los

  • Canadian_Dream
    04-04 02:18 PM
    The Durbin-Grassley bill would prohibit employers from hiring H-1B employees who are then outsourced to other companies. This is a method that some companies use to evade restrictions on hiring H-1Bs.


    2011 Tattoo alas con estrella tattoos de estrellas. tattoo de estrellas. Tattoo Estrellas ESTRELLAS. Tattoo Estrellas ESTRELLAS.
  • tattoo de estrellas. Tattoo Estrellas ESTRELLAS. Tattoo Estrellas ESTRELLAS.

  • Ramba
    07-09 07:44 PM
    I came across this law about the departmental control of numerical limitations, and I'd appreciate it if you all could post your interpretations of the same.

    DOS Reg 22 CFR �42.51:

    (a) Centralized control. Centralized control of the numerical limitations on immigration specified in INA 201, 202, and 203 is established in the Department. The Department shall limit the number of immigrant visas that may be issued and the number of adjustments of status that may be granted to aliens subject to these numerical limitations to a number:
    (1) Not to exceed 27 percent of the world-wide total made available under INA 203(a), (b) and (c) in any of the first three quarters of any fiscal year; and

    (2) Not to exceed, in any month of a fiscal year, 10% of the world-wide total made available under INA 203(a), (b) and (c) plus any balance remaining from authorizations for preceding months in the same fiscal year.

    Source: http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2004/aprqtr/pdf/22cfr42.33.pdf

    Assuming that USCIS approved (based on which it supposedly requested visa numbers from DOS) 60,000+ I-485 applications between June 13 and July 2, would it or would it not be in violation of the clause in bold ?

    Specifically, can anyone come up with a proper explanation of the words "plus any balance remaining from authorizations for preceding months in the same fiscal year" and why, if so is the case, USCIS may not have violated the law?

    PS:People seem to be focusing on the eligibility to file the I-485 application when immigrant visa numbers are/aren't available in this thread. I am quite new to the procedures involved in processing green card applications and also to IV. If this question is out of place or silly, please pardon my naivette. I'd really appreciate it if a senior member could nevertheless answer the question.:)

    Note: The information in this post is the personal opinion of the author and is not to be construed as legal advice.

    I feel that they did not violate any clause. Till June 30 which is end of third quarter, they are authorized to approve (3*27%*140K) 113,400. However they approved only 66,400 till May 31. That yields about 47,000 for June alone(10%+any number not used in previous months). The reamining visas are eligible for Jul 1, which is 13,000. Put together June and July1, it comes 60,000. Therefore they did not violate any law. This makes only 126,000. The remaining number was splitted for Consular processing.

    my 2 cents...


    tattoos de estrellas. Plantilla de tatuajes de
  • Plantilla de tatuajes de

  • CADude
    02-20 06:32 PM
    If possible, please change it without any delay? EB3 is only able to cross past May 2001 for 3 times in last 3 years where EB2 are enjoying GC most of time. No point in playing wait game with EB3 India. Otherwise, you will wait for-ever. :)

    Does anyone want to make a guess of when EB3 India 2002 will become current ? I am thinking of changing the case to EB2.. Should I change my case or should I wait for EB3 to be current ?

    tattoos de estrellas. tattoo de mariposas.
  • tattoo de mariposas.

  • dealsnet
    08-22 09:58 AM
    We are not terrorist. Majority are from India, China etc. You are asking for help from terrorists !!!!!!!!!!! (according to you)
    We didn't blow up any buildings. We built buildings, civilized world, literature and technology.
    We have more than 5000 years of civilized history. That time your people and Europeans are nomads and barbarians. We have great universities and Cities during ancient times.

    You are totally ignorant about the world you live. Leave about immigration. You are day dreaming. You thought just file I-485 will give you GC, you need to file I-130 or I-140 before that.

    The majority of you people are cruel and harsh individuals, how dare you insult a man that is sick just because of his weight. The majority of you are also from middle eastern countries - not exactly buddies with the USA. Canadians didn't come here to blow up buildings, people from your part of the world did. Canadians were here to help, and were one of the first countries on the scene.
    Canadians are allies, not enemies. You folks need to be the ones to go back where you came from!


    tattoos de estrellas. tattoos de corazones. tattoos
  • tattoos de corazones. tattoos

  • desi3933
    02-03 07:15 AM
    Here is the text under the attachment section

    The record contains a letter from your prospective employer. The letter indicates that you have been employed by XXXXXX company as a Senior Software Engineer. However, the record does not contain any evidence which establishes the salary or compensation package being offered. Therefore you must submit a currently issued letter or other evidence from the prospective permanent employer indicating that the salary or compensation package being offered.

    PD Mar 2002
    485 RD SEP 2007

    Submit job offer letter indicating job title and salary for the GC job. The letter must also mention that this job is permanant.

    Not a legal advice.
    US Citizen of Indian Origin

    2010 tatuajes de mujeres en los tattoos de estrellas. tattoo texts. tattoos de
  • tattoo texts. tattoos de

  • kumar1
    12-11 11:15 AM
    Kavita - I absolutely disagree with you. All of us (people on L-1, F-1, J-1, H1, B1, K1 and their derivatives....) went to US consulate to request for VISA. US consulate never came to your door with a VISA. Yes, it is your privilege to file GC but it is not your right. You can shower yourself with tags like "highly skilled" and what not but truth is, if we are so highly skilled then why are we having so many issues with Green Card? Why no one in this country is listening to us? They listened to bank's issues and came up with 750 Billion dollars in 2 flipping weeks. They have almost granted 15 Billion to auto industry. Meanwhile, we, self proclaimed highly skilled are fighting to have driver's license in DMV offices. And above all, when someone on H1 and L1 gets laid off, what is the problem in packing up the bag and going back to home country? It is us...you and me, who love to live in this country, we fight tooth and nail to live here, somehow, anyhow, at any cost!

    The way I look at it, we are here because this country provides us a very good quality of life and we see bright future for our family. After 5-10 years, we get so used to America that it hurts to even think that we are still on a temporary VISA.

    Please attack my thought, do not attack me or my self esteem!

    I absolutely agree with you. I can't imagine how a person of Indian or Chinese origin can blame themselves of this retrogression. To me, it is a reflection of poor self esteem.
    The bottomline is that we are here because we are needed here. We have the privilege to apply for green card in return for the work we do. Country quota does not make sense in employment based immigration. It is an unfair practice which has to stop someday.


    tattoos de estrellas. tattoos de estrellas. tattoo
  • tattoos de estrellas. tattoo

  • snathan
    06-10 01:44 PM
    @eastindia: I doubt if that 's required - "Basically a letter from employer". You definitely include your I-485 notice that shows that a AOS in pending.

    Remember the GC is for future employement. USCIS can anytime ask the letter to prove the job offer is still there. I know coupld of guys got RFE for the same.

    If there is no job, the underlaying I-485 become invalid and so there is no AOS.

    hair tattoo de estrellas. Tattoo Estrellas ESTRELLAS. Tattoo Estrellas ESTRELLAS. tattoos de estrellas. calaveras tattoo. Plantilla de
  • calaveras tattoo. Plantilla de

  • alkg
    10-16 11:28 AM
    Yes guys we should come together and do something instead of just waiting and waiting.. Most of us have already waited for 7-8 years............now we do not have that strength to wait for another 7-8 years .............



    tattoos de estrellas. 2010 Tattoo simbolos. tattoo
  • 2010 Tattoo simbolos. tattoo

  • .soulty
    03-19 11:02 PM
    moved it, status closed now.. ;)

    hot Plantilla de tatuajes de tattoos de estrellas. hairstyles letras para tattoo.
  • hairstyles letras para tattoo.

  • coopheal
    03-20 08:43 AM
    I agree with you man. These screwed up desi consulting firms sell LCs like it is walmart. And people who work for them don't care about the position offered or their qualifications. They just want to have multiple LCs and I-140s and then cut the line when it is convenient.

    Don�t do character assassination of EB3 applicants. EB3s who now have qualifications/job for EB2 should definitely try to convert over to EB2. EB3s don�t listen to people like these. It�s the same mentality which opposes eliminating country limits; more over its same mentality which opposes EB reforms. Grow up��

    Trying to stop an EB3 person who spent more time than you in GC queue and has qualification for EB2 is just insane.


    house tattoo de estrellas tattoos de estrellas. Máquina de tattoo DE LUXE
  • Máquina de tattoo DE LUXE

  • abc
    11-17 12:34 PM
    How long can we keep our career on hold..

    I have decided to switch with a better job and restart with PERM. Anyway, EB3/2003 PD is no GOLD.

    Even if some law gets passed in 2007. With new EB2, I will get GC may be max 1/2 years later.

    What do you think?

    tattoo tattoo de mariposas. tattoos de estrellas. tattoos de estrellas.
  • tattoos de estrellas.

  • fcres
    07-23 04:15 PM
    Well according to this FAQ dated 07/23 they will accept application without medical report (Qn# 13) which is also an initial evidence. So i hope EVL is also ok.


    pictures tattoos de corazones. tattoos tattoos de estrellas. Lane#39;s Blog: tatuajes de mariposas en la
  • Lane#39;s Blog: tatuajes de mariposas en la

  • nixstor
    07-03 12:26 PM
    I admit, it seems discriminatory to say you can't get your GC now because you're from this country or that country but these "high volume" countries have created the current back log through their sheer numbers and sometimes multiple applications, not the system. The system is fair to ALL and for some group to say that it isn't fair because all of that group isn't getting what they want is unjust to the rest of us. I knew I would be pounced upon when I submitted my original post and it only proves my point of personal agendas; sometimes I wonder what the "I" in "IV" really stands for? Don't be so arrogant as to believe that your higher education should give you more rights than others - that doesn't fly with me! I am frustrated with this forum because of this arrogance and I may not visit too much longer!

    I do have one question for all of you who are in favor of eliminating the per country limit; do you support an eventual road to citizenship for the large group of people who dominate the "other side" of immigration? If you don't, some may think you hipocritical to want the rules changed for yourselves!

    Sheer number of applications from the high volume countries has created the backlog?? Are you saying/wishing that these people should not have come in the first place to avoid the backlog?? My friend, backlogs did not happen completely because of the sheer number of applications and gaming. Backlogs happened primarily because of wasted visa numbers and issues surrounding it. If there was no visa number wastage the priority dates would have been around 2-3 years behind as opposed to 7 or 8 years. There are gamers in every system. If a system does not work for people as it is supposed to, gamers do so to get out of the system. Not that IV condones such things but it happens in any system, when the system is broken.

    The I in IV definitely does not stand for me only or for any one only. I along with V only makes sense. I by itself does not get IV any where.

    So removing the per country limit would remove the "bias" off these countries and move it to the ones with lower populations; so, in essence the discrimination would be reversed?

    On one hand you are saying that there is a bias towards lower population countries now and you are ok with it, just because you happen to benefit from it. Is that what you mean?

    If retrogressed countries are asking for 75% of the numbers reserved to them rather than having one line for all, You have a good point in saying that the bias is shifting towards retrogressed countries. There is no such provision like that. The provision creates one line depending on when you entered the line. You enter the line ahead, you get it first.

    So keeping the limits intact is NOT a bias to you? You can't have it both ways. What do you think is a solution? The point system you referred to came with the same 10% limit on the retrogressed countries. What difference does it make to a retrogressed person with 96 out of 100 points, but still needs to wait for 4 years, while some one from Krakozhia walks away in 6 months with 60 points. B T W , you also said that higher education deserves more does not fly with you. I am not sure how you want points to be assigned, other than education and experience. Don't let the fear and protectionist thought take over the logical and rational thought.

    The "other side" of immigration is an entirely different topic. Their issues and our issues, their path to the end line and ours are entirely different. We can't simply compare apples and oranges and call people hypocrites. That said, I personally support it and feel that it will happen at some point depending on the majority in both houses and one party will suffer for the decisions it made. As a by stander, I sympathize with the situation the "other side" has been in. I have a full plate to work on.

    dresses hairstyles letras para tattoo. tattoos de estrellas. de tatuajes de estrellas.
  • de tatuajes de estrellas.

  • desi3933
    02-11 07:03 PM

    Calm down, PresidenO gave you good comment and you got carried away thinking that President Obama praise you. Just vent your frustration somewhere else.


    I saw your past comment and it seems like you have an Attitude problem.

    If something your are not agree or disagree that's fine but there is now way to go this far.


    Now you have come down to personal attacks while conveniently chosen not to reply to this. Did you read that pdf document and if so, show me where you see 13,000 unused numbers?

    Go for facts, not for fictional stories.

    Read this

    and tell us, where do you see 13,000 unused numbers?


    makeup tattoos de estrellas. tattoo tattoos de estrellas. tattoo de estrellas
  • tattoo de estrellas

  • thakkarbhav
    08-10 02:29 PM
    I am in. I am EB2 but I support this because this makes sense.

    girlfriend tattoos de estrellas. tattoos de estrellas. tattoos de estrellas. tattoo estrellas. tattoo estrellas. prioritydate
  • tattoos de estrellas. tattoo estrellas. tattoo estrellas. prioritydate

  • Dipika
    04-24 10:15 AM

    Opened my email this morning to see the card production ordered email (time stamp in my inbox reads 2:15 am PST 4/23/08); the approval date was 4/23/08.

    Been in meetings all day so not even a chance to call anyone about it.


    Good luck to all my fellow sufferers!


    Congratulations. Enjoy your freedom.
    I have question, how do you get email? i mean do we mention email address in 485 apps. sorry it's not on my head what i have filled in 485. Just need to know where and how we provides email address. And help us with more information.

    hairstyles 2010 Tattoo simbolos. tattoo tattoos de estrellas. of music notes. tattoo de
  • of music notes. tattoo de

  • neelu
    01-02 11:35 PM
    Everyone who is doing such excellent job spreading the word about IV on websites:

    Please also help the Add ONE Member campaign. Introduce just ONE member to IV, by Jan 31st.

    That will go a long way in helping all of us (be it CIR or SKIL or whatever vehicle our provisions ride on).

    Please participate and help others participate in the 'Add ONE Member' campaign.

    Thank you.

    02-19 12:12 AM
    This radical idea will end retrogression radically. This concept is little tough for people who have no knowledge of country quota to understand.

    1. There is a bill in the house now

    HR 264 Introduced to Congress
    Section A - It will grant GC to people with > 5 years in US
    Section B - For EB skilled immigration for people with <5 years in US, it makes LC process more difficult.

    2. We must encourage this bill with some amendments. Section A which automatically gives green card to people > 5 years in US should be ELIMINATED. Section B should remain.

    3. This causes a reduction in I-485's and CP's because you need to be resident in United States for a minimum of 5 years to apply for Labor. Then ROW people would be able to apply for I-140 and I-485 automatically.

    4. In the last quarter of every year the leftover visas(EB1 and EB2 ROW people will not be able to apply for labor->I-140+I-485 until they stayed in US for 5 years) will be spilled to EB 2 and EB 3 India and China. EB3 ROW, India and China visa retrogression issue will be solved because we will have spillovers for atleast 5 years. This bill is not against ROW people. EB3 ROW people will benefit immensely.

    5. The restrictionists will be happy because nobody can start the green card process without staying in US for atleast 5 years (F1 + h1, j1 + h1, f1 only, j1 only, h1 only statuses)

    So, we should support HR 264 bill with a few amendments if possible.

    09-10 12:04 PM
    Are you saying that whoever is happy in their job without a GC is in a closet or jail?Only if you plan to remain in the U.S. permanently and you don't like the fact that you'll have to wait for many years without the ability to get a salary raise or promotion, without your spouse being able to work (if you have one) and being forced to leave the U.S. immediately if you get laid off.

    If you are perfectly happy with your H1-B job and planning to stay in the U.S. only temporarily, then no, you are not in a jail or closet. But 99% of us are.

    Related Posts by Categories

    Total Pageviews